Here, let me show you what I mean:

This is an exampled of a post what I call "text from unknown users and not knowing the context"

When I click on the message, things start to make sense:

Now I see that this person just replied to that root post, and then AND ONLY THEN, the message makes sense to me.

"Schöner jünger geiler als WER?" Habe ich mich jedes Mal gefragt. 😋

Thank you for clarification. I affirm that fancy box is not triggered there, but image neither displayed directly. On my instance, clicking on an image creates some kind of gallery, allowing me to browse through the images:

Do you expect that fancybox is triggered when you would click on the camper image in my screenshot?

They are wrapped in body-attach?

Bitte schön:

And Fancybox works seamlessly with it ❤

Wenn Du ein eigenes Bild verlinken möchtest, geht es recht komfortabel mit diesem Button:

Bei externen Bildern müsstest Du den [img=quelle]Beschreibung[/img] Tag selbst erstellten, ja. Immerhin kannst Du die URL zum Bild selbst ja kopieren und einfügen

Wenn ich Dich richtig verstehe, wünschst Du Dir die Möglichkeit "einfach externe Bilder mit einer Beschreibung einzufügen"?

Hello @Friendica Developers @Friendica Support @https://friendica-dev.mbbit.de/profile/friendicadev Hello dear community, I would like to discuss with you about the appearance of posts with multiple images on #Friedica. Here is my opinion:
The current way multiple #images are displayed is awful:

Yeah, you saw it by my embedded examples your self. What bothers me most is:

• It just looks messy (especially when there is a mix of landscape and portrait format)
• Besides the aesthetics, multiple images take a lot of room (when you do not use an add-on like show more)

My suggestion on which I would love to hear your opinion is to use a grid format like on #mastodon:

I would pitch a suggestion by adding a PR for a (from my point of view) "better" appearance based to this
tutorial. I do not like to use JS in general and would leave it out by determine the suited amount of columns in the backend.

But before I invest time on that, I want to hear your feedback. Thank You!

Hello @Friendica Developers I like to ask you about your opinion regarding the issue:

Currently, I am reworking the upload size limits description and usage for images on the Admin site. I encountered IMHO an inconsistency in the semantic of providing '0' and '-1' as a limit value:

• For the maximum size 0 means unlimited, but this is yet not interpreted that way in the code (there it is only compared if the image size is grater than the limit, which in case of 0 just rejects any file)
• For the maximum length -1 mean unlimited

Question: Which values should we use, and how should they be interpreted in the code base? For me, it would make sens to use "-1" in general for no limit and "0" for deactivated. But what would "0" then mean in the case of "image length"?

Any thoughts?

Ich habe die Friendica Seite von 1328 über meine Instanz aufgerufen und tatsächlich sehe ich dort nichts öffentlich:

Alle Beiträge sind nur zu sehen, wenn ich https://punkrock-underground.com/profile/1328 direkt über die punkrock-underground.com Instanz besuche.

Block punkrock-underground.com eventuell andere Server?

@Friendica Support : Just a curious question:
I follow quite a lot of mastodon account, and in the last days, mastodon users seem to develop a passion for polls.

I noticed that I am on my friendica instance are not able to participate in these polls since the content is only included in plain text.

Does #Friendica just do not support polls, or is it only my instance / a missing add-on that prevents me to participate in polls?

und das sagst Du (scheinbar) über die #Mastodon #ui. Schau dir mal die #Friendica #ui an! Die hat den Charm von Windows 95 O:-) Aber: #content over #style!

Aber trotzdem liebe ich das #fediverse

upload_max_filesize=xM